Exploring the audiophile experience with the RME ADI-2 DAC and Topping Pre90 components.
Summary
- The RME ADI-2 DAC impresses with its detailed highs and clean sound.
- Users find the Topping Pre90’s remote subpar, but its noise-free volume a plus.
- Conversion from the Burson Conductor to the RME ADI-2 received mixed feedback due to differences in sound tonality.
- Some users prefer the neutral sound profile of the RME ADI-2 while missing the prominence of bass from the Burson Conductor.
audiophiles Love the RME ADI-2 DAC
The RME ADI-2 DAC receives praise for its clean and detailed sound. User Placid_Glacier2 highlights the superb instrument separation, detailed highs, and clean bass output compared to the Burson Conductor.
Divisive Opinions on Topping Pre90
While some appreciate the noise-free volume control on the Topping Pre90, user Placid_Glacier2 decries the remote quality, labeling it as ‘garbage.’ This discrepancy in user experience raises questions about Topping’s design choices.
critical Audiophile Evaluations
User nero000nero’s journey through various DACs and amps leads to a singular conclusion – the RME ADI-2 DAC stands out for its near-perfect performance as a DAC/AMP. This reinforces the positive sentiment towards RME’s product.
In contrast, user Main-Industry-3250 dismisses the discussion as ‘useless electro scrap,’ showcasing differing perspectives within the audiophile community regarding gear preferences.
The RME ADI-2 DAC and Topping Pre90 generate a mix of excitement and critique among audiophiles, as they navigate the nuances of sound quality, user interfaces, and overall listening experiences.