A cheap catalyst made of sugar claims to destroy CO2, but is it too good to be true?
Summary
- The technology is questioned for its practicality in terms of market demand
- Experts emphasize the need for diverse solutions to combat CO2
- The catalyst is praised for meeting key criteria for practical application
Debate Over Practicality
The catalyst’s conversion of CO2 raises concerns over the market demand for resulting products like CO
Experts Emphasize Solutions
Scientists stress the importance of multiple solutions to combat CO2 levels
Political Intrigues
Users joke about potential impacts on sugar prices and Big Twinkie’s lobbying against funding
Sustainability Concerns
An echo of concern is voiced over the diminishing resources required for the catalyst