TikTok Creators Sue U.S. Government: First Amendment or Foreign Ties?

The TikTok creators’ lawsuit against the US government over the divestiture law has sparked intense debate on Reddit. Users are divided on the constitutionality and implications of the case. Some argue for the First Amendment rights, while others question the foreign ties.

Summary

  • Debate over whether the constitution protects foreign-owned corporations.
  • Concerns about TikTok’s PR firms being active on Reddit.
  • Users tired of frequent reposts across multiple subreddits.

Constitutional Concerns

Some users express skepticism about the lawsuit’s viability, citing the lack of First Amendment protections for foreign entities. One user states, “The constitution does not offer any relief to foreign owned corporations or people residing outside the US.”

Propaganda Allegations

There are speculations about TikTok’s influence, with a user noting, “The PR firms hired by TikTok are very active on Reddit.” This raises concerns about potential propaganda tactics shaping online discourse.

Repetitive Posts

Users voice frustration over the repetitive nature of the TikTok lawsuit posts across various subreddits, with one user lamenting, “I’m tired of seeing this posted in dozens of subreddits everyday all day.”

The diverse opinions and reactions on Reddit provide a multifaceted view of the TikTok creators’ legal battle, shedding light on the complexities of the case and its broader implications.